Cases 1 - 10 of 529
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner:
ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent:
ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BANKS
Defendant:
RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, KELLYCE HEBERT and others
Mann v. USA
as 1:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Gabrielle Mann
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ragsdale v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Duncan Ragsdale
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
State Farm Life Insurance Company v. Laney, et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
State Farm Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
K.L.(1), G.L., April Laney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Miller v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Miller
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DODSON et al v. WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
JOHN DODSON, SCOTT TURNER, JOSEPH GALLAGHER and others
Defendant:
WAGNER CONSULTING GROUP, INC. and JONATHAN BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
