Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Goodman v. Elpida Memoray Inc et al
as 5:2010cv03738
Plaintiff:
James B. Goodman
Defendant:
Elpida Memory Inc, Emerging Memory and Logic Solutions, Inc, Fidelis Co., Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Elpida Memory, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG et al
as 1:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Elpida Memory, Inc.
Defendant:
Infineon Technologies AG, Infineon Technologies North America Corp. and Best Buy Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Elpida Memory, Inc. v. Infineon Technologies AG et al
as 2:2010cv00152
Plaintiff:
Elpida Memory, Inc.
Defendant:
Infineon Technologies AG and Infineon Technologies North America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281
TESSERA INC V ITC
as 10-1176
Intervenor:
Acer America Corporation, Acer, Inc, Elpida Memory (USA) INC. and others
Elpida Memory (USA) INC:
, , and others
Appellee:
International Trade Commission, International Trade Commission, International Trade Commission and others
Appellant:
Tessera, Inc., Tessera, Inc., Tessera, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00027
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC v. A-DATA Technology (U.S.A.) Co,. Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv00383
Plaintiff:
Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC
Defendant:
A-DATA Technology (U.S.A.) Co,. Ltd., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
ON Semiconductor Corporation et al v. Hynix Semiconductor Inc et al
as 6:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
ON Semiconductor Corporation and Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC
Defendant:
Hynix Semiconductor Inc, Hynix Semiconductor America Inc, Hynix Semiconductor Manufacturing America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In Re IN THE MATTER OF CERTAIN SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUITS USING TUNGSTEN METALLIZATION AND PRODUCTS CONTAINING SAME
as 1:2008mc00709
Petitioner:
LSI CORPORATION and AGERE SYSTEMS, INC.
Respondent:
EMPLOYEES OF ELPIDA MEMORY, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Petro Computer Systems, Inc., et al v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al
as 08-16478
:
In re: DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (DRAM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC., JOHNSON & JENNINGS, INC. and G.C.A. STRATEGIES, INC.
Defendant:
WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, WINBOND ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC., INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG, INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES NORTH AMERICA CORP. and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ANTITRUST INSTITUTE and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
LSI Corporation et al v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00165
Plaintiff:
LSI Corporation and Agere Systems Inc.
Defendant:
United Microelectronics Corporation, Integrated Device Technology Inc, AMIC Technology Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
