Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Friedlam Partners, LLC v. Lerner and Company Real Estate et al
as 3:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
FRIEDLAM PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
LERNER AND COMPANY REAL ESTATE, BRENTWOOD ARMS APARTMENTS, LLC, DELANE GLEN APARTMENTS, LLC and others
Quast v. English Riding Supply, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Susan Quast
Defendant:
English Riding Supply, Inc., ERS Equistrian, Inc.,, English Riding Supply, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Yates v. Adams et al
as 5:2022ct03114
Plaintiff:
William Yates
Defendant:
Major Adams, Capt. English and Cpl. Travestead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
MARLA ENGLISH
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
English v. Ballard et al
as 5:2022ct03061
Plaintiff:
Quinton Dante English
Defendant:
Ricardo Ballard, Officer Johnson and John Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Galeas v. Vaughn et al
as 5:2020ct03349
Defendant:
James Oliver, Sergeant Andrews, Captain Stockley and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Galeas, Jr. and Jorge Gevara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Carvajal et al
as 5:2020ct03271
Defendant:
T. Lyn, Michael Carvajal and Nicole C. English
Plaintiff:
David A. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
English Construction Company, Inc. v. City of Charlotte
as 3:2020cv00346
Defendant:
City of Charlotte
Plaintiff:
English Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGLISH v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00062
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
JANE ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
