Cases 1 - 10 of 4,641
SMITH v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
CURTIS GREGORY SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENNIS v. NOW BOXING PROMOTIONS
as 2:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
JARON ENNIS
Defendant:
NOW BOXING PROMOTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
EDWARDS v. ENNIS
as 1:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
RASHAN EDWARDS
Defendant:
MAJ. ENNIS, MAJOR ENNIS, MAJOR/CAPTAIN SISSEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Middletown Township of Pennsylvania et al
as 2:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Defendant:
KS Pools and Patios Company, Inc., Eric Konyves, Middletown Township of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWALD v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv04625
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WELLPATH HOLDINGS LLC, KIP HALLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00067
Defendant:
SECURITY LT. SKINNER, MAJOR B. PALKO, DEPUTY PAUL ENNIS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MAJOR v. HALLIGAN et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
WILLIAM NICHOLSON, PAUL ENNIS, ERICSON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD MAJOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MACK v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Defendant:
DEPUTY ADAMS, JOHN DOE, SUPERINTENDANT CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN MACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MILLER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2020cv00234
Plaintiff:
DARREN L. MILLER
Defendant:
PAUL ENNIS, JOHN WETZEL, LT. BEDNARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WILLIAMS v. NYBERG et al
as 1:2020cv00208
Defendant:
R. ROSCINSKI, CO HARMON, CINDY CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
