Cases 1 - 10 of 1,211
Falkowski v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Falkowski
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wynn v. Harris
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Eric Wynn
Defendant:
Annette D. Watkins Harris, Robert E. Hawthorne, Jr. and Luneburg Circuit Court-Clerks Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Smith v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eric Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lipscomb v. Crout et al
as 7:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Eric Crout, Kristen Haight and Chad Dotson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pennington v. USA
as 5:2024cv81551
Petitioner:
Eric Keith Pennington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Young et al
as 7:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Chavis Rashad Williams
Defendant:
Eric Young, Leslie Powell and Wyant Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pretty v. Richmond Commonwealth Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Eric Pretty
Defendant:
Richmond Commonwealth Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
