Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Wilson v. Scott County
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Eric Wilson
Respondent:
Scott County
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harden v. Easter Seals et al
as 2:2021cv12434
Plaintiff:
Travis Harden
Defendant:
Easter Seals, David Bair, John Givens and others
Wilson et al v. Reliance AG, LLC et al (TV1)
as 4:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Reliance AG, LLC and Evan Conrad
Plaintiff:
Morris Wilson and Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Wilson v. Ohio Depart of Rehab, et al
as 20-3978
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, Unit Manager Chief, LIEUTENANT STUFF, SERGEANT DOAD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC WILSON
Wilson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2020cv00607
Defendant:
Unit Manager Chief, Doad, Reader and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Unit Manager Chief, Doad, Reader and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Carroll v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 2:2015cv13360
Plaintiff:
Bernie Williams, Shanice Boyette, David Latvick and others
Defendant:
Martin Winterkorn, Jan Bures, Volkswagen Manufacturing Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill-Wilson et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00239
Defendant:
Davol Inc., and C.R. Bard, Inc
Plaintiff:
LaVita Hill-Wilson and Eric Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monroe Coleman v. Eric Wilson
as 15-6169
Petitioner - Appellant:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC WILSON, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
