Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 467
Prada Garcia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2173
Petitioner: SANDRO PRADA GARCIA, YESICA ALEJANDRA BARRETO NINO, MARLON ESTEBAN PRADA ACOSTA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-Bolanos v. Garland
as 24-2085
Petitioner: RAUL ESTEBAN RAMIREZ-BOLANOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01860
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Motivar Gonzalez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1464
Petitioner: STEFANY MOTIVAR GONZALEZ, YIMMI ALEXANDER ROBALLO PAYARES, EDDIE SANTIAGO ARANGO MOTIVAR and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joel Zalvin v. Michael Carrel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2024cv00482
Plaintiff: Joel Zalvin
Defendant: Michael Carrel, Raymond Cohen, David Demski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Saenz Bernal, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1135
Petitioner: LAURA SAENZ BERNAL and ANDRES ESTEBAN LEON SAENZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Button #257700 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff: Matthew Ryan Button
Defendant: Ryan Thornell, Julie Bowers, Esteban Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camano Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-449
Petitioner: MONICA YENNIFERT CAMANO RAMIREZ, ESTEBAN FERNANDO RODRIGUEZ BECERRA and JUAN ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ CAMANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff: Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant: Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lopez #286561 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: Kristopher Joel Lopez
Defendant: Ryan Thornell, John Mattos, Esteban Aguirre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?