Cases 1 - 10 of 10
John Williams v. Unknown Party, et al
as 23-15763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LUTHER WILLIAMS, named as Mr. John Luther Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Director ADOC, RODRIGUEZ, First Name Unknown, named as CO Rodriguez, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as CO's, Correctional Officers at Rincon Wilmot ADOC and others
Eta Tikotzky v. Kai Data, LLC
as 2:2021cv00971
Plaintiff:
Eta Tikotzky
Defendant:
Kai Data, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Eta Tikotzky v. Mainstreet Realtors et al
as 5:2019cv01493
Plaintiff:
Eta Tikotzky
Defendant:
Mainstreet Realtors and John Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Eta Tikotzky v. Century 21 Plaza
as 2:2019cv06968
Defendant:
Century 21 Plaza
Plaintiff:
Eta Tikotzky
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Eta Tikotzky v. Remax Real Pros
as 5:2019cv01494
Defendant:
Remax Real Pros
Plaintiff:
Eta Tikotzky
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Mossman v. Polos et al
as 8:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Legacy Custom Homes, Inc., Eric Trabert & Associates, Inc., Peter Polos and others
Plaintiff:
Eric F Mossman
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Eta Compute, Inc. v. Semones et al
as 1:2018cv00552
Defendant:
Inphi Partners, LLC, Timothy D. Semones, Susan Desko and others
Plaintiff:
Eta Compute, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alpha Eta Rho, Inc et al v. Alpha Eta Rho, Inc et al
as 8:2014cv00227
Defendant:
Alpha Eta Rho, Inc, Eric Barton, Peter W. Bro and others
Plaintiff:
Alpha Eta Rho, Inc and Epsilon Rho
Pryer v. ETA of Character of Judy et al
as 2:2009cv02895
Plaintiff:
David Nelson Pryer, II
Defendant:
ETA of Character of Judy, 58 TV Station, 102.5 Kiss FM Sacramento Radio Station and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Scotto v. CUC International et al
as 1:2007cv00213
Plaintiff:
Livia M. Scotto
Defendant:
CUC International, Cendent, Doug T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
