Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Smith v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv12447
Plaintiff:
Eva Smith
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation and Revlon Group Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Smith et al v. Hood
as 3:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Delores Eva Smith and Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
Duane E. Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. McLeod Regional Medical Center of the Pee Dee Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
Eva Smith
Defendant:
McLeod Regional Medical Center of the Pee Dee Inc, Genesis Healthcare Inc, Dr Brent Baroody and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Smith et al v. Koon et al
as 3:2019cv02155
Plaintiff:
Carson Smith and Eva Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department of Lexington County, Sgt. Miles Rawl, Brian "Jay" Koon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tracy L. Stewart v. Catalina Banuelos et al
as 2:2015cv03404
Defendant:
Catalina Banuelos, A. Beauchamp, Patricia Bradford and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy L Stewart
Stewart v. Banuelos et al
as 2:2015cv00843
Plaintiff:
Tracy L. Stewart
Defendant:
Catalina Banuelos, Sherri Carter, Christina Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Patel et al
as 3:2014cv02372
Plaintiff:
Mario Marquis Gray
Defendant:
f/n/u Patel, James Holloway, f/n/u Biggers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Target Corporation
as 4:2014cv00939
Plaintiff:
Eva Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv02012
Plaintiff:
Geraldrick Jones
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Dwight Barbee, Wayne Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Schofield et al
as 2:2014cv02010
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Dwight Barbee, Wayne Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
