Cases 11 - 20 of 902
Kimble v. Evans et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Glay Kimble
Defendant:
Officer Evans and Officer Koon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
JIHAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
PATRICIA THOMPSON, MICHELLE THARP, SUSAN EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS
Defendant:
THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. doing business as GENSIGHT and MICHAEL MENARD
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
EARLS v. COLLINS et al
as 3:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RAYMOND EARLS, III
Defendant:
JOHN COLLINS, BARR, TIPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcallen v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04928
Plaintiff:
Ashley Mcallen
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., Hadley Evans and Rosalind Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
EVANS v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
MARQUICE EVANS
Respondent:
PATRICIA THOMPSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Court of Common Pleas of York County et al
as 1:2023cv01812
Plaintiff:
Evan David Smith
Defendant:
Court of Common Pleas of York County, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Honorable Gregory M. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
