Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
ATKINS v. SYKES et al
as 1:2021cv02161
Plaintiff:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE S. SYKES, WILLIAM J. BAUER, JOEL M. FLAUM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVE et al v. BURTRON et al
as 1:2021cv01721
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOEL RUSH, CITY OF WESTFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY KINCAID EVE and CASEY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00601
Debtor In Possession:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
EVE et al v. SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
as 1:2020cv02036
Plaintiff:
KAREN BURKHART, SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT-MARY-OF-THE WOODS, INDIANA, ASHLEY K. EVE and others
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00560
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Plaintiff:
Eve Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EVES v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00058
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Petitioner:
STEVEN EVES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EVES v. BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 3:2017cv00217
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
STEVEN EVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
