Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Dixon v. Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain
as 2:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Mike Dixon
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Malory Zajdel, et al v. Exel, Inc., et al
as 23-1005
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALORY ZAJDEL and ADAM ZAJDEL
Defendant / Appellee:
EXEL, INC., a Foreign Corporation, dba DHL Supply Chain (USA) and MATTHEW PAUL BOHLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miranda v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Young et al v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Michael Young and Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
