Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Dixon v. Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain
as 2:2024cv01891
Plaintiff:
Mike Dixon
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. dba DHL Supply Chain doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miranda v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01897
Plaintiff:
Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661 Family Medical Leave Act
Young et al v. Exel, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01344
Plaintiff:
Michael Young and Donna Miranda
Defendant:
Exel, Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Thorpe v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02035
Plaintiff:
Mark Thorpe et al. and Mark Thorpe
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al, DHL Express (USA), Inc. doing business as DHL Express and Exel Inc. doing business as DHL Supply Chain (USA)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01950
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kagey v. Exel, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00772
Defendant:
Exel, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Kagey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
