Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Saunders v. American Heritage Moving Solutions LLC et al
as 9:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Saunders, Katherine L. Saunders and Thomas Earl Saunders, Jr
Defendant:
American Heritage Moving Solutions LLC and US Safe Moving LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Cunningham v. Billings Clinic et al
as 1:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Correctional Health Partners and Billings Clinic
Plaintiff:
William Earl Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. USA
as 1:2017cv00159
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Earl Samuel Walters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. $4,566.00 in U.S. Currency
as 9:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$4,566.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Earl Scott John
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841
Blodgett v. USA
as 4:2015cv00036
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Blodgett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Caswell v. Kirkegard et al
as 9:2014cv00047
Petitioner:
Peter Earl Caswell
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caswell v. Kirkegard et al
as 2:2014cv00014
Petitioner:
Peter Earl Caswell
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maryland Casualty Company v. Lightfoot Veterinary Services et al
as 4:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Maryland Casualty Company
Defendant:
Lightfoot Veterinary Services, Randall Cromwell, Candyce Cromwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howell, et al v. Earl, et al
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Marion I. Howell and Francis L. Howell
Defendant:
Travis Earl , Kelli Munter , Scott Secor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blodgett v. USA
as 4:2012cv00043
Petitioner:
Randy Earl Blodgett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
