Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Guillory v. Tucker et al
as 3:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
Michael Damien Guillory
Defendant:
David Earl Tucker and Bryan Tucker Hauling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00419
Plaintiff:
Troy Earl Tucker
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Tucker v. USA
as 3:2021cv00289
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Tucker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Tucker
as 21-30194
Defendant / Appellant:
Robert Earl Tucker, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Curtis Tucker, Jr.
as 17-3503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CURTIS EARL TUCKER, JR., aka Reginald T. Shannon
Tucker v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv01188
Plaintiff:
David Earl Tucker
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Tucker v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv01048
Plaintiff:
David Earl Tucker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cobbs v. Tucker et al
as 1:2011cv02522
Plaintiff:
Terrell Cobbs
Defendant:
Earl Tucker, Ms Reed and Captain Darcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Tucker, et al v. Delbert Hosemann, et al
as 10-60859
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL TUCKER and ARRECE WEBB, Individually and on behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Appellee:
DELBERT HOSEMANN, Secretary of State for the State of Mississippi, JIM HOOD, Attorney General Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, combined and in their capacity and STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, Individually as well as in their Representative Capacity and all others Simularly Situated
Tucker et al v. Hosemann et al
as 2:2010cv00178
Plaintiff:
Earl Tucker , Arthur Hotshot Ankston , Curtis Rerun Jackson and others
Defendant:
Delbert Hosemann, Jim Hood and State Election Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
