Cases 1 - 10 of 14
HailSolve, Inc. v. Early
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
HailSolve, Inc.
Defendant:
William E. Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
United States of America v. United Inner City Services DBA Early Start et al
as 1:2023cv01253
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cedric Deadmon
Garnishee:
United Inner City Services DBA Early Start
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Early v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Tammy P. Early
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Allen et al v. Early
as 3:2021cv00214
Defendant:
Marion McClain Early
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Allen and F Christin Allen
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Story v. Weirich
as 2:2020cv02221
Defendant:
Amy Weirich
Plaintiff:
Early Story and Earley Story
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Wooten v. City of Chattanooga, Tennessee et al (TWP2)
as 1:2018cv00206
Plaintiff:
David A. Wooten
Defendant:
Michael Early and City of Chattanooga, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGee v. Cider et al (TV1)
as 1:2016cv00353
Plaintiff:
Rodrick D McGee
Defendant:
Cider, Early, CHA Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Miscellaneou:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Campbell v. Knoxville Police Dept. et al
as 3:2010cv00438
Plaintiff:
Anthony H Campbell
Defendant:
Knoxville Police Dept., Jeffery Green, Dick Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haygood v. Early, et al
as 1:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
Timothy D Haygood
Defendant:
Michael Early, Chattanooga Police Department and City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
