Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Easley v. Pike County Mississippi et al
as 5:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Pike County Mississippi, Pike County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff James Brumfield and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Young
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
Warden Herbert Young
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Easley v. Brumfield et al
as 5:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
Chad Everette Easley
Defendant:
James Brumfield, Herbert Young, Richard Bynam and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easley v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00218
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Roger Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Easley v. Fresenius Medical Center - Mid Mississippi et al
as 3:2020cv00777
Plaintiff:
Victor Easley, Sr.
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc. doing business as Fresenius Medical Care North America, Bio-Medical Applications of Mississippi, Inc. doing business as Fresenius Medical Center - Mid Mississippi, John Does 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00223
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00140
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
