Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Easterling v. Mahoning County et al.
as 4:2023cv02140
Plaintiff:
Rean Easterling
Defendant:
Mahoning County, Trinity Correctional Food Services, Sheriff Jerry Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antonio Oscar Tatum v. Montgomery County, et al
as 22-12137
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONIO TATUM
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY COURTS, MONTGOMERY COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Easterling v. Correctional Officer - Portae Shield #2633 et al
as 2:2021cv05917
Plaintiff:
Alexander Easterling
Defendant:
Correctional Officer - Portae Shield #2633 and James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Easterling v. Danville City Jail
as 7:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Anthony Easterling, Jr.
Defendant:
Danville City Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covington v. Easterling
as 3:2019cv01273
Plaintiff:
Charles Jerome Covington
Defendant:
Todd Easterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Jackson et al
as 4:2019cv03191
Defendant:
Judge Maria T Jackson, Assistant DA of District 339th, Danny K. Easterling and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Joshua Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Franklin Parish Detention Center et al
as 3:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Sonya Smith, Chad Lee, Kevin Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Easterling et al
as 3:2019cv00308
Defendant:
Randy Sewell, Lt Bordelon, Chad Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Moses Mack Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Easterling et al
as 4:2018cv03016
Respondent:
Danny K. Easterling and Lacy Johnson
Petitioner:
Joseph Junio Johnson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berlanga v. Easterling et al
as 4:2017cv01580
Plaintiff:
Juan Modesto Berlanga
Defendant:
Jason S. Easterling and Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
