Cases 71 - 80 of 306
Morgan v. Easterling et al
as 4:2013cv00081
Petitioner:
Fred Morgan
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Higgs v. Stafford Easterling, et al
as 13-6374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CARL HIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFFORD EASTERLING, Attorney, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner, COOKIE CREWS, Warden, Warden and others
David Johnson v. Kenneth Sconyers, et al
as 13-14865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH SCONYERS, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, SHERRY LIGHTNER, Ms., Classification Coordinator, in her individual and official capacity, J. CAFFIE, Ms., Classification Specialist, in her individual and official capacity and others
Cantrell v. Easterling
as 3:2013cv01079
Petitioner:
David M. Cantrell
Respondent:
Joe Easterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harvey v. Shirley et al
as 2:2013cv01928
Plaintiff:
Leone R. Harvey
Defendant:
H. Shirley, Justin, D. Kyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Demery v. Easterling et al
as 2:2013cv00209
Petitioner:
Timothy Lee Demery
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling, Robert E Cupp and K.C. Baedwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anthony Panzica v. Corrections Corp of America, et al
as 13-6018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY PANZICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES CORPORATION, HARDEMAN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Larry Noel v. Joseph Easterling
as 13-5971
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY J. NOEL
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH EASTERLING, Warden
Scott Grammer v. Joseph Easterling
as 13-5770
Petitioner - Appellant:
SCOTT W. GRAMMER
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH EASTERLING, Warden
John Marrie v. Joe Easterling
as 13-5661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN D. MARRIE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE EASTERLING, Warden, former HCCF Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
