Cases 1 - 10 of 691
Kareem Millhouse v. Suzanne Heath, et al
as 23-1333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
Mandriez Spivey v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-2912
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANDRIEZ RAMON SPIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
EBBERT, individual and in his official capacity, UNKNOWN SW, MARR, individual and in his official capacity and others
Kenneth Reid, et al v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH R. REID
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE, ERIC HOUSTON, BRANDON JAQUAY HOLMES and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY BURNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID J EBBERT
SPIVEY v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2022cv00596
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
Ebbert, UNKNOWN SW, Marr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
Johnson v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv02109
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States, John Doe, David S. Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2021cv00915
Defendant:
David J Ebbert and Colbert
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
