Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Woods v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Woods and Demetrius L Woods
Defendant:
Doe, Gary Musslelwhite, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormack v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Michael McCormack
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reid, Jeremy Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shadell v. Starks et al
as 5:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Quentin Mixon, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Eddie Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Ethan Shadell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eddie McBride, et al v. International Longshoreman A
as 13-4260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDDIE MCBRIDE, LEONARD RILEY, JR., EDDIE KNIGHT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMAN ASSOCIATION
Eddie Knight v. Murphy Marine Serv, et al
as 11-4290
Petitioner:
EDDIE KNIGHT
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OWCP and MURPHY MARINE SERVICES
Eddie Knight, et al v. Intl Longshoreman Assn
as 10-3486
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDDIE KNIGHT, CHARLES S. MILLER-BEY, EDDIE MCBRIDE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
INTL LONGSHOREMAN ASSN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
