Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Murillo-Chavez v. Garland
as 23-1997
Petitioner:
EDGAR MURILLO-CHAVEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Architectural Concepts, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01465
Defendant:
TruStile Doors, LLC, Architectural Concepts, LLC, Jose Carmelo Marquez and others
Plaintiff:
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GUEVARA-CHAVEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv82100
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
EDGAR GUEVARA-CHAVEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alejandro Jimenez, et al v. GLK Foods, LLC, et al
as 18-2227
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO J. JIMENEZ, EDGAR N. CHAVEZ, JESUS J. RAMIREZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GLK FOODS, LLC and RYAN DOWNS
Gonzalo Chavez Esquivel, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-70983
Petitioner:
GONZALO CHAVEZ ESQUIVEL, MARIA DEL CARMEN GODOY TORRES, EDGAR ALEJANDRO CHAVEZ GODOY and others
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Alejandro Jimenez, et al v. GLK Foods, LLC, et al
as 17-3248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALEJANDRO J. JIMENEZ, EDGAR N. CHAVEZ, JESUS J. RAMIREZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GLK FOODS, LLC and RYAN DOWNS
Edgar A Chavez v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05805
Plaintiff:
Edgar A Chavez
Defendant:
Does and General Motors, LLC
Chavez v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv02143
Movant:
Edgar Alberto Chavez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jurado Jimenez et al v. GLK Foods LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Jurado Jimenez, Edgar Nieto Chavez, Jesus Jurado Ramirez and others
Defendant:
GLK Foods LLC and Ryan A Downs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
