Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Baker et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01623
Plaintiff:
Edmund Baker and Christina Hanson-Baker
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Oppenheimer v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Foster McDonald, Jennifer Blake, Edmund Hillis II and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Geist v. Berryhill
as 5:2017cv00116
Plaintiff:
James Edmund Geist
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. McGill Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
Carrie Denise Jones
Defendant:
McGill Brothers, Inc. and Darryl Edmund Baine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rankin v. Statesville, NC, Police Dept., et al
as 5:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Delbert Lamar Rankin
Defendant:
Frank G. Johns , Carolyn B. Bouchard , Tom Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BITTNER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01181
Plaintiff:
EDMUND C. BITTNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING CORPORATION et al v. TOMMY ABBOTT AND ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 1:2012mc00036
Defendant:
TOMMY ABBOTT AND ASSOCIATES, INC., EDMUND SCARBOROUGH, INDIVIDUAL SURETY and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING CORPORATION and MICHAEL FREDERICK PAVING CORPORATION
Edmunds v. Ingram et al
as 3:2012cv00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Edmunds
Defendant:
FNU Ingram, Anthony Lockett, Steven J. Yakubic and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers v. Astrue
as 7:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Edmund Conyers
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
