Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cotton v. Shalk et al
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
David Edward Cotton
Defendant:
Jennifer Shalk, Doe 1 and Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
COTTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11413
Plaintiff:
COREY DEAN EDWARD COTTON and CORY DEAN EDWARD COTTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cotton v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv03072
Plaintiff:
Edward Cotton
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. Hale Cotton, Jr.
as 21-1086
Defendant / Appellant:
HALE EDWARD COTTON, JR., aka Hal Edward Cotton, Jr.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DADUS et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05859
Plaintiff:
AUDIE DADUS , MAXINE DAVIS , THEODORA DELCO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dadus et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03069
Plaintiff:
Audie Dadus , Maxine Davis , Theodora Deleo and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Geneva Reese et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv09790
Plaintiff:
Emilio Aguirre, Edward Cotton, Michael Lemmon and others
Defendant:
Chief of Police Charles Beck, City of Los Angeles, Deputy Chief Police Jose Perez, Jr. and others
JACKSON v. COTTON
as 2:2008cv05691
Plaintiff:
ZENAIDA N. JACKSON
Defendant:
EDWARD COTTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sal Aguilar et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2008cv02301
Plaintiff:
Sal Aguilar, Kaileen Cassedy, Javier Cortez, - and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, William Bratton, Jim McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
