Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. Zhen (Hernandez)
as 21-3135
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dacheng Zhen, AKA jack666888live, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Simple, Josiel Gustavo Martinez Guzman and Walkin Francisco Arias Villar
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Hernandez
USA v. Eduardo Hernandez
as 18-50181
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EDUARDO HERNANDEZ, AKA Ed Garcia, AKA Eduardo Garcia, AKA Eduardo Hernadez, AKA Eduardo Perez Hernandez, AKA Edward Hernandez, AKA Lil Oso, AKA Jorge Mateo Martinez, AKA Oso, AKA Hernandez Oso, AKA Edward Perez, AKA Terco
CIT Bank, N.A. v. Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo et al
as 3:2017cv01948
Defendant:
All Other Persons or Parties Unknown Claiming any Right, Ttitle, Lein, or Interst in the Real Poperty Known as 3435 SW Columbia Dr, Madras, OR 97741, Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo, Andrea L. Ryun and others
Counter Defendant:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
CIT Bank, N.A.
Unknown:
Katie Riggs
Cross Defendant:
Estate of Shari S. Marrazzo
Counter Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Cross Claimant:
Edward Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
USA v. George Hernandez, Jr.
as 17-30213
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
GEORGE EDWARD HERNANDEZ, Jr.
Rossel Alfaro Zelaya v. A+ Tires, Brakes etc.
as 17-400
Petitioner:
ROSSEL O. ALFARO ZELAYA, a/k/a Rossel Sandoval, EDWARD HERNANDEZ and MONTOYA MORENO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Respondent:
A+ TIRES, BRAKES, LUBES AND MUFFLERS, INCORPORATED, FLORES WELDING, INCORPORATED, JULIO FLORES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv01810
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Diaz v. Alverez et al
as 3:2007cv00175
Plaintiff:
Humberto Diaz
Defendant:
Javier Alverez, Carmen I. Perez, Edward Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
