Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00047
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Powell v. Clay
as 4:2014cv02553
Petitioner: Tony Edward Powell
Respondent: Becky Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Powell v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 14-16595
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT EDWARD POWELL
Respondent - Appellee: CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Pointserve, Inc. v. Powell et al
as 1:2013cv00739
Defendant: Mark Lane and Dr. G. Edward Powell, Jr.
Plaintiff: Pointserve, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
FILING ERROR
as 1:2013cv00738
Defendant: Mark Lane, Pointserve, Inc. and G. Edward Powell
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
United States of America v. Powell We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013mc00033
Defendant: Mark Edward Powell
Plaintiff: United States of America
Unknown: Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Powell
as 2:2013at00731
Defendant: Mark Edward Powell
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Powell v. Madden, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00057
Plaintiff: Tony Edward Powell
Defendant: Madden , George , Heck and others
Respondent: Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Powell v. People of the State of Texas et al
as 5:2012cv00191
Petitioner: Tony Edward Powell
Defendant: People of the State of Texas and The Attorney General of the State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powell v. George, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01527
Plaintiff: Tony Edward Powell
Defendant: George , Madden , Heck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?