Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Kolak v. Backerville, et al
as 24-1182
Plaintiff:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant:
DENISE BACKERVILLE, MR. CARTER, ARAPHAHOE SHERIFF, ARAPAHOE COUNTY and others
Blankenship, et al v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6053
Plaintiff:
JOHN HAYDEN BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), HAYLEE BLANKENSHIP, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Andrea Lynn Blankenship, deceased (DC Grady Co. PB-2021-43), DELSIE MAY PYE, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Leon W Pye; (DC Grady Co. PB-2022-19) and others
Defendant:
JOHN KEVIN STITT, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. OKLAHOMA PARDON AND PAROLE BOARD, ADAM LUCK, individually and as former Board Member of Pardon and Parole Board and others
Konecny v. The Big M Casino, et al
as 24-1090
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
THE BIG M CASINO, GEORGE FREELAND, DANA GOODELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Czajkowski v. Edwards, et al
as 24-1012
Plaintiff:
CONRAD J. CZAJKOWSKI
Defendant:
AMANDA S. EDWARDS, ELIZABETH A. CHRISTIAENS and HALEY SHUVEILLER
United States v. Smith
as 23-6188
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DRESHAWN EDWARD SMITH
Sullivan v. Graham, et al
as 23-3153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN M. GRAHAM, JR., MELINDA YOUNG, DAVID CLYMER and others
Sullivan v. Hartford Financial Services Group, et al
as 23-3154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT B. SULLIVAN
Defendant / Appellee:
THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC., CAROL MORRIS, LADUSKA ANNE HANEY and others
Weimer v. Smith, et al
as 23-6115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD WEIMER
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED COLSON SMITH, JR., CHARLES WHITTINGTON, INAS YACOUB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
