Cases 1 - 10 of 342
GLENN v. CLAYTON et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
GURLEY E. GLENN
Defendant:
GERALD CLAYTON, DOUGLAS R HARRISON, EDWARD HOUGH WILLAFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN v. TOWN OF NORWOOD et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant:
TOWN OF NORWOOD, TRENTEN JAMAR WEATHERS, JOHNATHAN LEE FURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. COMPU-LINK CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv01118
Defendant:
BLOOM RETIREMENT HOLDINGS INC., COMPU-LINK CORPORATION doing business as CELINK, CARYN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
:MUHAMMAD v. SPIVEY et al
as 1:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
:BAARIA-ABDULLAH :MUHAMMAD and :BAARIA-ABDULLAH :MUHAMMAD doing business as :LUMIN-LUCKY: [OF THE FAMILY] LANDER
Defendant:
REX ALAN SPIVEY, STATE EMPLOYEES' CREDIT UNION, PHILLIP A. GLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
LAMAR v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
KEITH EDWARD LAMAR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GLOVER v. USA
as 1:2023cv01060
Petitioner:
EDWARD LAMONT GLOVER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ELLERBEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEVERNE ELLERBEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
REGINALD M. LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLATER v. USA
as 1:2023cv00575
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD PLATER, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
LILES v. EDWARDS
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
REGINALD MAURICE LILES
Defendant:
BRITTANY P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
