Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Brandon Roberts v. USA, et al
as 17-2436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDON ROBERTS, on behalf of St. Clair C. Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS and EILEEN KOSTIC, Service Center Manager
ROBERTS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2015cv04705
Plaintiff:
BRANDON ROBERTS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS and EILEEN KOSTIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rory Walsh v. Michael Hagee, et al
as 15-5132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rory M. Walsh, Natural Guardian of S.J.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael W. Hagee, James R. Clapper, Jr., Director of National Intelligence, Chris Conner, District Judge and others
Rory Walsh v. Michael Hagee, et al
as 14-5058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rory M. Walsh, Natural Guardian of S.J.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael W. Hagee, James R. Clapper, Jr., Director of National Intelligence, Chris Conner, District Judge and others
HILL v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 5:2013cv00014
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HILL
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, EILEEN KOSTIC and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rory Walsh v. Michael Hagee, et al
as 12-5367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rory M. Walsh, Natural Guardian of S.J.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael W. Hagee, James R. Clapper, Jr., Director of National Intelligence, Chris Conner, District Judge and others
Boord v. Kostic
as 1:2012cv22688
Plaintiff:
Hugh MacQueen Boord
Defendant:
Eileen Kostic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv21935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
WALSH v. HAGEE et al
as 1:2011cv02215
Plaintiff:
RORY M. WALSH
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. HAGEE, JAMES R. CLAPPER, JR., CHRIS CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
