Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Thomas v. Holmes
as 26-40438
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Dr. Issac Kwarteng, Bryan Collier and others
Wilson et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2026cv05294
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Wilson and Brandon Wilson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, University of Texas Medical Branch, Texas Board of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Booker v. Yates et al
as 6:2025cv00476
Plaintiff:
Kedrien Booker
Defendant:
Kalyn Yates, Nicholas Martin, Sargeant Maricela Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Lufkin et al
as 6:2025cv00396
Plaintiff:
Quinton Cox
Defendant:
Richard Babcock, Elbert Holmes, Jamadre L Enge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diez v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
James Logan Diez
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Warden Jerry Sanchez, Elbert Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Amonett et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Flores et al
as 2:2023cv00263
Plaintiff:
Albert Shane Lester
Defendant:
Steven A Flores, Elbert Holmes and Candice G Flannel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Jasso
as 23-40446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Abel Jasso, Luiz Garcia, Elbert Holmes and others
Thomas v. Holmes et al
as 2:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Warden Elbert Holmes, Deputy Warden Placido Samaniego, Dr Issac Kwarteng and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
