Cases 21 - 30 of 193
James Briscoe, III v. Michael Martel, et al
as 21-15574
Respondent:
LAURA ELDRIDGE and SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BRISCOE III
Kohen Uhuru v. B. Velasquez, et al
as 21-15239
Defendant / Appellee:
R. NORIEGA, B. VELASQUEZ, LAURA ELDRIDGE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Priest
Barnett et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2021cv00042
Plaintiff:
Bruce Rose, J&J Real Estate Investments, LLC, Cynthia A. Wolz and others
Defendant:
Brian K Taylor and Paula Peterson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kayie Wright v. Johnny Hawkins
as 21-6050
Defendant / Appellee:
GILLIO, JOHN DOE, Maintenance Worker, JANE DOE, Psychiatrist, Central Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYIE SHAUNE WRIGHT
Kohen Uhuru v. Laura Eldridge, et al
as 20-17501
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, KIM PETERSEN, LAURA ELDRIDGE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv07479
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kohen Uhuru v. People of the State of CA, et al
as 20-56333
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERYLINE MANCUSI, Psychologist, Psy. D CA License #PS4-27513, FABIAN HADJAJ, Jewish Chaplain and People of the State of California, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Priest, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03182
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Darryl Dunsmore v. Laura Eldridge, et al
as 20-56263
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Respondent / Appellee:
LAURA ELDRIDGE and XAVIER BECCERA
Darryl Dunsmore v. Laura Eldridge, et al
as 20-56209
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL LEE DUNSMORE
Respondent / Appellee:
LAURA ELDRIDGE and XAVIER BECCERA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
