Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Grajales v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv06972
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Grajales
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Mr. F. Foo, M.D. Beeper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00831
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1502
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Subject ID: 176-17887 v. Zimmer et al
as 2:2022cv14412
Plaintiff:
Subject ID: 176-17887 and Occupant
Defendant:
Jennifer Zimmer, Eli Lilly And Company, RJ Raffa INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY doing business as Radiology Imaging Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GRIMES et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2021cv02367
Plaintiff:
JERAD GRIMES and GEORGIA EMILY EDMONDSON
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and LILLY USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
