Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Eric Boatman, et al v. Elijah Muhammad, et al
as 23-2624
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC BOATMAN and CAROL JARVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, RAMON MCCALPINE, CITY OF HARVEY and others
Eric Boatman, et al v. City of Harvey, et al
as 22-2487
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ERIC BOATMAN and CAROL JARVIS
Defendant / Appellant:
CITY OF HARVEY, ELIJAH MUHAMMAD, RAMON MCCALPINE and others
Carson v. The City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
Trachon Carson and Trachon L. Carson
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Peter Ujda, Star No. 4980, Elijah Muhammad, Star No. 5487 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00328
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boatman et al v. Muhammad et al
as 1:2018cv04237
Plaintiff:
Eric Boatman and Carol Jarvis
Defendant:
Ramon McCalpine, Harvey Police Detective York, Robert Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-4744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01680
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Muhammad v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2008cv00384
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Micheal Chertoff, Deval Patrick, Tim Murray and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad v. Jackson et al
as 2:2008cv00369
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Jessie Jackson, Jessie Jackson, Jr, Rainbow Push Coalition and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Muhammad, Jr. v. Thomas et al
as 2:2008cv00350
Plaintiff:
Elijah Muhammad, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew Thomas, Joseph Arpalo, Selective Enforcement Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
