Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Cooley v. Campbell et al
as 2:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Donald E. Cooley
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, Elizabeth Conley, Michael Sands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Hakala et al
as 1:2013cv00061
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Dwayne Coleman
Defendant:
Michael C. Hakala, Ruth Taylor, Stephanie Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caudle v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv04302
Plaintiff:
Oran Caudle
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections , Corizon, Inc. , Urology Care, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wimberly v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 4:2012cv00735
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Wimberly
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Dewayne Kempker, Diane Simmerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Campbell et al
as 2:2012cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Q. Adams
Defendant:
Gary Campbell, T. Bredeman, Elizabeth Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoples v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01189
Plaintiff:
Reynold Edward Peoples
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Pamela Swarts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caudle v. Gonzalez et al
as 2:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
Oran Caudle
Defendant:
Thomas Cabrera , Elizabeth Conley and Gary Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Clements et al
as 1:2010cv00193
Plaintiff:
Jermaine S. Ewing
Defendant:
Tom Clements, Mike Kemna, Troy Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Lombardi
as 2:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Doug Prudden, Jill Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Crawford
as 1:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Bishop
Defendant:
Larry Crawford, George Lombardi, Chuck Dwyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
