Cases 1 - 10 of 526
Ellis-Erkkila v. Manske
as 24-50329
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ann Ellis-Erkkila
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Jeffrey Manske, Magistrate Judge Gilliland, Administrative Courts Counsel and others
Baughman v. Bowman
as 24-40286
Plaintiff:
Steven Kurt Baughman
Defendant:
Jimmy Bowman, Warden, Powledge Unit, Vernon Mitchel, Assitant Warden, Powledge Unit, Ronnie Stanhope, Lieutenant, Powledge Unit and others
Bodwin v. Collier
as 24-40213
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clyde Bodwin
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Juan M. Garcia, Michael O. McNeil and others
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Priscilla Ellis
Defendant:
United States of America, Evertt Cottrell, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Wilver Rodriguez
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Contreras v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Contreras
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coler v. Sheriff of Ellis County
as 3:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coler
Defendant:
Sheriff of Ellis County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bishop v. Bennett et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Montez Lisha Bishop and Montez Lesha Bishop
Defendant:
Jimmy Bennett, Scott Beard, Richard Kennedy and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
