Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
AARON VRH
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ELTON JOHN CRENSHAW, Medical Doctor at San Quentin State Prison, J. LEE and others
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
(PC) Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 4:2019cv01329
Defendant:
Dr. Lee, Elton John Crenshaw, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Vrh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2019cv00274
Defendant:
Lee, Elton John Crenshaw, San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Vrh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy Hobbs v. Elton John, et al
as 12-3652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUY HOBBS, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
ELTON JOHN, an individual also known as SIR ELTON HERCULES JOHN, BIG PIG MUSIC, LTD., a foreign business organization, form unknown and BERNARD J. TAUPIN, an individual also known as BERNARD TAUPIN
Hobbs v. John et al
as 1:2012cv03117
Plaintiff:
Guy Hobbs
Defendant:
Elton John, Bernard John Taupin and Big Pig Music Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
US v. Elton Tharrington
as 08-4394
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ELTON JOHN THARRINGTON
Riches v. McCartney, et al
as 08-15212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL MCCARTNEY, HEATHER MILLS, ELTON JOHN and others
Riches v. McCartney et al
as 3:2007cv05878
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Paul McCartney, Heather Mills, Elton John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
