Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brenda M. Reinhart LLC et al v. Audacy Texas, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv02904
Plaintiff:
Brenda M Reinhart LLC, William L Ackley, Miriam Ackley and others
Defendant:
Audacy Texas LLC, Audacy Inc, iHeart Media Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Chevrestt v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2018cv06304
Plaintiff:
Angel Chevrestt
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Allman v. Emmis Communications Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv00835
Plaintiff:
James Allman
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation , Emmis Radio, LLC , Emmis Radio License, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGlynn v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2017cv06407
Plaintiff:
David McGlynn
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Smith v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2017cv00528
Plaintiff:
Byron Smith
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tabak v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2016cv09167
Plaintiff:
Alec Tabak
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Parisienne v. Emmis Communications Corporation
as 1:2016cv08302
Plaintiff:
Theodore Parisienne
Defendant:
Emmis Communications Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02568
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION v. ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00089
Plaintiff:
EMMIS COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
Defendant:
ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
