Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Picado v. Ender et al
as 1:2023cv22393
Plaintiff:
Yury Picado
Defendant:
Natalie Ender, Judge Tanya Brinkley, Leonard Thompson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Porter, Qubia v. Hurless, Denise et al
as 3:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Qubia Porter
Defendant:
Denise Hurless and Sandra Ender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson, Alfred v. Maassen, Tammy et al
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Alfred Wilson
Defendant:
HSU Mgr. Tammy Maassen, RN Amanda L. Luebchow, Debra Tindquist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Lontonio v. Tegels et al
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith
Defendant:
Tegels, Masson, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Tegels et al
as 2:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
Lontonio Jamin Decruz Smith
Defendant:
Tegels, Masson, Dr Liu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank, Gregory v. Hentz, Anthony et al
as 3:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Gregory Frank
Defendant:
Anthony Hentz, Sandra Ender, Tammy Maassen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poyner, Matthew v. Demler, Wendy et al
as 3:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Poyner
Defendant:
Wendy Demler, Tara Anderson, Sandra Enders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reveles, Michael v. Carr, K. et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael M. Reveles
Defendant:
K. A. Carr, Warden Tegels, Dep. Warden Buesgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. ENDERS et al
as 1:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
SCOTTY E. BROWN
Defendant:
SHANE ENDERS, SGT. YOUNG and LT. DUDAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ender v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv00687
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Alan Gregory Ender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
