Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Rodriguez Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3113
Petitioner:
MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ and CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Calderon Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-1384
Petitioner:
VICTOR ENRIQUE CALDERON RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PENA RODRIGUEZ v. RICKY D. DIXON, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2023cv21253
Defendant:
Enrique Pena-Rodriguez and Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Rodriguez
as 23-40201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Manuel Enrique Ayala Rodriguez, also known as Gordo, also known as El Gordillo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Orellana et al v. Real Innovative Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv08396
Plaintiff:
Esdras Nehemias Gutierrez Cerrato, Auver Hoyos Altamirano, Edgar Pilaguicin and others
Defendant:
Carlos Morales, Jacobs Development Corp., ECI Contracting, LLC d/b/a ECI Services and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
USA v. Cadena-Rodriguez
as 21-50545
Defendant / Appellant:
Enrique Cadena-Rodriguez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
USA v. Cadena-Rodriguez
as 21-50509
Defendant / Appellant:
Enrique Cadena-Rodriguez, also known as Enrique Cadena Rodriguez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
