Cases 1 - 10 of 21
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv04143
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarez v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00117
Petitioner:
Hector Enrique Alvarez
Respondent:
Warden Gary Williams and Attorney General State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mario Alvarez-Cartaya v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60422
Petitioner:
MARIO ENRIQUE ALVAREZ-CARTAYA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. The Lyons Tap, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01931
Defendant:
Enrique Alvarez and The Lyons Tap, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebeca Idalia Hernande Gonzalez
Ramos Perea v. Editorial Cultural, Inc.
as 19-2129
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ LAGUERRE, BEATRIZ LAGUERRE SAAVEDRA, BEATRIZ ALEXIA ALVAREZ LAGUERRE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO RAMOS PEREA
Defendant / Appellee:
EDITORIAL CULTURAL, INC.
Laguerre Saavedra, et al v. Editorial Cultural, Inc.
as 19-2119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAFAEL ENRIQUE ALVAREZ LAGUERRE, ROBERTO RAMOS PEREA, BEATRIZ LAGUERRE SAAVEDRA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
EDITORIAL CULTURAL, INC.
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Beatriz Maria Laguerre Saavedra et al
as 3:2019cv01458
Defendant:
Gabriel Efrain Ortiz Laguerre, Rafael Enrique Alvarez Laguerre, Beatriz Alexia Alvarez Laguerre and others
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Julio Alvarez Vasquez v. William Barr
as 19-70675
Petitioner:
JULIO ENRIQUE ALVAREZ VASQUEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
ALVAREZ v. WALMART
as 2:2018cv04371
Plaintiff:
ENRIQUE ALVAREZ
Defendant:
WALMART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Enrique Alvarez-Gallo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71243
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE ALVAREZ-GALLO
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
