Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BROWN v. THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv02864
Plaintiff:
PAUL ERIC BROWN
Defendant:
THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2 and others
4Th Party Defendant:
JOHN DOE OFFICER 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2018cv01741
Petitioner:
ERIC BROWN
Miscellaneou:
PLAINFIELD CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Lake County Jail et al
as 2:2018cv00100
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Natalie Lovett and Eric Brown
Plaintiff:
Hirman Eugene Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Abernathy et al v. Chicago
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Abernathy , Phillip Adams , Juan Ahedo and others
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy Wirtz, et al v. City of South Bend
as 11-3811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROY WIRTZ, ERIC BROWN, PETER REIMERS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF SOUTH BEND, Indiana
Pappas v. Captain Dante Zorzi et al
as 1:2011cv06239
Plaintiff:
Katherine Pappas
Defendant:
Captain Dante Zorzi, Officer Carter Rickey, Officer M. Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wirtz et al v. South Bend City of
as 3:2011cv00325
Plaintiff:
Roy Wirtz , Eric Brown , Peter Reimers and others
Defendant:
South Bend City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Brown et al
as 1:2010cv08045
Plaintiff:
Jerry Caldwell
Defendant:
Eric Brown and Sergio Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
