Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Osmanova v. Fricke et al
as 2:2024cv14070
Plaintiff:
Evelina Osmanova
Defendant:
Joanna Fricke, ERIC FLOWERS. in his official capacity as Sheriff of Indian River County, Florida, Joanna Lynn Borras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19558
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLOWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walsh v. Judge Cynthia Cox et al
as 2:2022cv14180
Plaintiff:
Meghan Walsh
Defendant:
Judge Cynthia Cox, Judge Robert Meadows, Alexis Echevarria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Seeton v. Roman, et al
as 2:2021cv14365
Plaintiff:
Holly Seeton
Defendant:
Keefe Roman, Indian River County Sheriff Office and Eric Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kenyon v. Flowers et al
as 2:2021cv14251
Plaintiff:
Ward Lawrence Kenyon
Defendant:
Milo Thornton and Sheriff Eric Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv14446
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv66799
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eric Flowers v. Ray Hobb
as 14-2895
Petitioner:
Eric Flowers
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Flowers v. Hobbs
as 5:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
Eric Flowers
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
