Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
CHAING v. NAPOLITANO et al
as 2:2013cv01602
Petitioner:
SAMRETH CHAING
Respondent:
JANET NAPOLITANO, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JOHN T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. HOLDER et al
as 3:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
GLENN B. DAVIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHELE M. LEONHART, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH v. BUSH et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THOMAS E. LACHKOVICH
Defendant:
GEORGE W. BUSH, MARK SULLIVAN, RICHARD CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
MAISANO v. WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2012cv01726
Plaintiff:
DALE MAISANO
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, U.S. ATTY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, AZ. ST. ATTORNEY GEN TOM HORNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01299
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARTOVI v. HOLDER et al
as 2:2011cv00720
Petitioner:
ALI PARTOVI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JANET NAPOLITANO and KATRINA KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
COHEN V. HOLDER, et al
as 3:2010cv00035
Petitioner:
LESLIE CHARLES COHEN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JOHN MORTON, HARLEY G. LAPPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01495
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
