Cases 1 - 10 of 315
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bownes v. Hood et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey, Raymond Byrd and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bownes v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Bownes
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Ralph Doxey and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Holder et al
as 1:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch and Jeff Sessions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little et al v. United States of America et al
as 7:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Fleming, Charlsa Suzanne Little and Jeanette Driever
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, Democratic National Committee, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meneses v. Lozano et al
as 7:2016cv00402
Plaintiff:
Joel Cardenas Meneses
Defendant:
Eduardo Lozano, Anibal Alaniz, Gabriel Gaytan and others
Consol_defendant:
Guadalupe Mendoza and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starr v. Holder
as 1:2016cv00255
Petitioner:
Keith Starr
Respondent:
Eric Holder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payne v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Marshall Fisher, Raymond T. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
