Cases 1 - 10 of 87
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-1393
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-1158
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Michelle Ritter v. Eric Schmidt et al
as 2:2026cv04382
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ritter
Defendant:
Eric Schmidt, Hillspire LLC, Glaser Weil Fink Howard Jordan and Shapiro LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-971
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-325
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-265
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
RANDALL E. GARVER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-176
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER, JENULLE BRIGUAL and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 26-42
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
RANDALL E. GARVER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER and others
Lettieri v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 25-3061
Petitioner:
DAVID C. LETTIERI
Respondent:
RANDALL E. GARVER, MICHAEL HOUTEWATER, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Kotevski v. Bush et al
as 2:2025cv02212
Plaintiff:
Milan Michael Kotevski and Miki Kotevski
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Rodman Clinton, William Jefferson Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
