Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Santos Bey v. Frosh et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Warden Robert Dean and The State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos Bey v. Berry et al
as 1:2021cv03229
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey doing business as Erick Anthony Santos
Defendant:
Troy Berry and Kevin Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Santos Bey v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2021cv03160
Plaintiff:
The State Of Maryland, Charles County Sheriffs, Detective Robert Smith and others
Defendant:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02937
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02705
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bey v. Queen Anne County District Court et al
as 1:2019cv03647
Defendant:
Queen Anne County District Court, Maryland State Treasurer's Office, Maryland Transportation Authority and others
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos Bey v. Social Security Administration
as 8:2018cv03993
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. Hightower et al
as 1:2018cv03613
Defendant:
Derrell Hightower and Brian McInerney
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Santos Bey v. Hightower et al
as 8:2018cv03472
Defendant:
Derrell Hightower and Brian McInerney
Plaintiff:
Erick Javier Santos Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
