Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Marleis Trover v. Craig Oglesby, et al
as 24-1733
Plaintiff:
MARLEIS TROVER, as Personal Representative of the Estate of DONALD D. GADDIS
Defendant:
CRAIG OGLESBY and DUSTIN KELLEY
Kayla Heidelberg v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
KAYLA HEIDELBERG, Administrator of the Estate of Cleve Heidelberg, Jr.
Defendant:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, LARRY BERNARD, EMANUEL MANIAS and others
Kelsey Smith v. Michael Whitsel
as 24-1694
Plaintiff:
KELSEY JILL SMITH, as Administrator of the Estate of Dalynn Kee, and on behalf of her Next of Kin
Defendant:
MICHAEL WHITSEL
Eddie Bolden v. Angelo Pesavento, et al
as 24-1674
Plaintiff:
EDDIE L. BOLDEN
Defendant:
ANGELO PESAVENTO, JAMES OLIVER, ESTATE OF EDWARD SIWEK and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nicolette Langston, et al v. NCAA, et al
as 24-8012
Petitioner:
NICOLETTE A. LANGSTON, as Administrator of the Estate of ZACK LANGSTON and DANAE YOUNG, as mother and next friend for D.L., a minor
Respondent:
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and MID-AMERICA INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETICS ASSOCIATION
Estate of Katharine Saranam Johnston v. Floyd County, Indiana, et al
as 24-1513
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF KATHARINE SARANAM JOHNSTON
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DAN FOREMAN, Captain and others
Joe Feazell v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
JOE FEAZELL
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC. and PAMELA E. HART, Administrator of the Estate of Andrew H. Tilden
Rae-Jean Reynolds v. Keith Shelton, et al
as 24-1363
Plaintiff:
RAE-JEAN REYNOLDS, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jessie Leonard, Deceased
Defendant:
KEITH SHELTON, JOSHUA SMITH, JOSEPH REYNOLDS and others
FTC v. Margaret Cumming
as 24-1288
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARGARET E. CUMMING, in her capacity as personal representative of the Estate of David T. Cumming
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
