Cases filed in Minnesota
Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Burford v. Guardian Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv02263
Plaintiff: Eugene Burford
Defendant: Guardian Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Beadle v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02045
Petitioner: Jack Eugene Beadle
Respondent: Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff: Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant: Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00626
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ford v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00329
Plaintiff: Eugene Ford
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00071
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Boulanger v. Holets
as 0:2023cv03696
Plaintiff: Eugene Lionel Boulanger
Defendant: Jonathan Holets
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. Brott We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv02805
Petitioner: Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent: Joel Brott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arnold v. Witt
as 0:2023cv02806
Petitioner: Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Respondent: Sheriff Dawanna Witt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff: Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant: 3M Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?