Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. Negaard et al
as 1:2023cv00195
Defendant:
Jessica Purdy, Holly Negaard, Jessica Shanafelt and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Kruger v. Ruhl et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Petitioner:
Anthony Eugene Kruger
Respondent:
Sheriff Gary Ruhl and Richland County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chase et al v. Andeavor Logistics, L.P. et al
as 1:2019cv00143
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Chase, Mavis Huber, Jamie Lawrence and others
Defendant:
Tesoro Companies, Inc., Andeavor, Andeavor Logistics, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Burns et al v. Secure Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00194
Defendant:
Secure Energy Services, Inc., Secure Energy Services USA, LLC and Eugene Davis
Plaintiff:
John Burns and Carita Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. USA
as 3:2017cv00042
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carl Eugene Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Crop Production Services, Inc. v. Keeley et al
as 3:2016cv00314
Plaintiff:
Crop Production Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Dawn Keeley , John Keeley , Eugene Keeley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartole v. Rodlund et al
as 3:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Marcus Trevor Bartole
Defendant:
Mark Rodlund, Maggie D. Anderson, Melanie Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parizek v. Chad Pringle, Warden
as 3:2015cv00055
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene Parizek
Respondent:
Chad Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bartole v. Rodlund et al
as 3:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
Marcus Trevor Bartole
Defendant:
Mark Rodlund, Travis Bullock, Maggie D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wedemeyer v. Bismarck Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Wedemeyer
Defendant:
Bismarck Police Department, Dale Schaffer, Sheldon Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
