Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Eugene v. Rasier, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Joshua Eugene
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
White v. Renzi et al
as 1:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Dyanna M. White
Defendant:
Judge Eugene Renzi, Judge Peter Shwerzmann, Attorney Michael Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Scalia v. S&D Restaurant, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Steven Davenport and S&D Restaurant, Inc. doing business as Parkside Rotisserie & Bar
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nicholas v. Long et al
as 1:2020cv00362
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nicholas
Defendant:
Melissa Long, Lincoln D. Almond, Shawn Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos v. Johnson and Wales University et al
as 1:2020cv00335
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nicholas Ermilo Santos and Courtney Ciao
Defendant:
Matthew Parker, Johnson and Wales University, Stephanie Ann Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SCALIA v. LOS ANDES, LLC, d/b/a Los Andes Restaurant et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Cesin Curi, Omar Curi and Los Andres, LLC
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eugene D. v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00087
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eugene DiMillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cota v. Willette et al
as 1:2018cv00463
Defendant:
John Willette and Eugene Willette
Plaintiff:
Karen Cota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LMG Rhode Island Holdings, Inc. v. RI Superior Court, et al
as 1:2018cv00297
Plaintiff:
LMG Rhode Island Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Rhode Island Superior Court , Netti C. Vogel and Eugene J. McCaffrey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
